|
Origins of the Universe? Or just plain silly?
In an attempt to provide some sort of explanation for the existence of the universe,
conventional science has sought refuge in the theory that it came about as part of a vast cosmic bang. We are told that somehow, in the depths of time a great explosion occurred propelling
energy and matter across phenomenal distances. According to the theory this matter eventually settled down to form the stars and planets and this tiny planet of ours.
Reality?
But is the theory of the Big Bang really how it started? Here the answer is a resounding no! In
fact anyone with enough logic will immediately see the pitfalls of a theory, that like Darwin’s Origin of the Species has been seized upon to distance science from the hand of God.
Platform Already Existed.
The whole theory of the Big Bang as the point of creation for the universe
falls down on one simple point: This is the fact that for an explosion to occur it needs something to explode into. If nothing existed before the Big Bang then there was no platform for the explosion to have taken place. In which case it means that if such an enormous bang had once occurred it could only have done so within the framework of a setting which was every bit a part of the physical world as the universe is today. In other words the Big Bang exploded into a physical universe that was already extant before it occurred. Either way this proves that the Big Bang could not have been responsible for the creation of all matter.
The Conclusive Formula.
It has always been argued that the language of science is mathematics. If the Big Bang can be
disproved mathematically then to all intents and purposes the theory is redundant. In this case the mathematical proof is devastatingly simple. For example scientists love to refer to the
state of the universe milli seconds after the Big Bang, but we on the other hand would like to refer to The Big Bang milli seconds before it happened. In our equation we shall represent this
as zero, because according to our top brains nothing existed. The trouble is that no matter what you do with zero, it always equals zero. For instance 0 x 1414141 = 0. 0/189889787 still
equals 0, and 0 + 128789738237 is precisely zero ( if this last assertion astonishes you turn to our separate page on this
theme, which illustrates that even the present logic of mathematics can sometimes be faulty). The fact is that even the biggest number you can think of when multiplied by zero, still equals
zero. In plain language nothing!
Magic Formula.
Our magic formula then can be expressed simply as 0 = 0, and as we have heard no amount of
mathematical manipulation will make zero any bigger. With the Big Bang it means that you cannot get something out of nothing. There has to be something there to work with. It also means that
as a theory to explain the origin of all matter the Big Bang must now be consigned to the dustbin of history.
Before the Big Bang.
The obvious truth is, that even if the Big Bang theory was as sound as scientists are saying,
there had to exist something that brought this bang into being. Some describe this as the hand of God, and others as yet another dimension of existence that forged the way to this present
universe. Either way it shows that the Big Bang is not the answer for creation, but one more mystery of a pre-existing universe that just gets stranger and stranger.
See also why the theory of evolution
can similarly be disproved by simple logic alone.
Out now !!! 666 - The Divine Harmony.
Is 666 really the number of all evil? Or is it the key to destiny itself?
Click here to purchase a copy of the sensational new book that shows 666 in a completely different light to the way it has come to be known, and perceived for thousands of years.
The New Age begins here !!!
Read the Book. Discover the secret.
Special note
Some chapters of the first part of the book have been adapted from material previously
available on this site. This material constitutes only a very small portion of the total text of the book, and has also been extensively revised. Moreover, this source material is no
longer available on-line.
|
